Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's Daughters Won't Inherit Their Royal Titles, Due to an Ancient Rule

Some rules were just made to be broken

Updated 06/04/18

Chris Jackson/Getty Images

There's something especially classy about the tongue twister-y title bestowed on Meghan Markle by Queen Elizabeth II upon her wedding to Prince Harry. But, as People so helpfully reminded us all this week, if the newlyweds have any daughters together, the daughters won't be able to call themselves Duchesses of Sussex (say that five times fast), nor will they get to carry on Markle's Scottish title of Countess of Dumbarton or her Northern Irish moniker, Baroness Kilkeel. Any sons they have together, however, will be able to inherit their father's titles of Duke of Sussex, Earl of Dumbarton, and Baron Kilkeel.

The ancient peerage laws governing family inheritances have been changed before, however. Most recently, Queen Elizabeth introduced the Succession to the Crown Act in 2013, which rules that the next king or queen of the U.K. will be decided by birth order, rather than by gender. As a result, Princess Charlotte was able to retain her position as fourth in line to the throne, rather than dropping down to fifth, upon the birth of her younger brother, Prince Louis.

Unfortunately, the 2013 ordinance applies only to the direct line to the throne, so it would take yet another law change to allow Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's daughters to automatically inherit their titles. Unless the monarch at that point assigns them any more honorary titles, Harry and Meghan's children will be called Lords and Ladies of Mountbatten-Windsor, according to The Independent. Meanwhile, since Prince William is the oldest son of the Prince of Wales, his children will all be titled Princes and Princesses, due to yet another recent rule tweak by Queen Elizabeth.

See more: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's Sweetest PDA Moments from the Royal Wedding

These peerage laws, which give boys priority over their sisters no matter their birth order, have been around since the 17th century, and apply to U.K. citizens well beyond the royal family. Just last year, for example, the eldest daughter of a baron was denied her claim to her late father's title and 6,000 acres of land. According to The Telegraph, since Robin Neville, the 10th Baron Braybrooke, had seven daughters and no sons, his title went instead to a distant male cousin. Meanwhile, the baron's land went to the granddaughter of a previous Baron Braybrooke, who had stipulated that the inheritance would go back to his bloodline if no male heirs were produced by future titleholders.

Related Stories