MY POINT, is that only with smoking do we make this argument. We ignore the other items, because they are socially popular. I take issue with that and have TRIED to make that clear. I can not make the smoking argument on its own because there are too many other things which, IMO, are WORSE for everyone.
As far as drugs, I responded to someone yes. I don't think it was you who called addicts lazy and worthless, nor was it you who asked me (and ms. d) if we would make meth and coke legal. However, I responded to that person.
So yes, I've discussed more than just smoking, and so have 90% of the other posts.
IF the arguments were held to all things "bad for you" in the same way, then I would at least find the basis logical and fairly applied. But right now, all I see is government jumping on an anti smoker (NOT anti cigarette) bandwagon which ticks me off.